This is the latest in our series of blogs dealing with the problem of digestion of Hinduism, which is quite different from both inclusivism and conversion to Abrahamic faiths. For example, in Kerala, the digestion of many aspects of Hinduism in general, and the festival of Onam, in particular have been covered in the last few days. This post is part of the discussion on Phil Goldberg's 'American Veda' has been shown to be an example of this problem. You can find Part-1 of the current discussion here. However, many Hindus live in denial for a variety of reasons. You can find the first set of posts in 2012 on Goldberg's American Veda: Analysis-2 that summarizes the first set of feedback on AV is here, and Analysis-1, is the very first summary, where AV was introduced to the forum, and shows Goldberg's attempted defence of his work.
There are several other dicussions of 'digestion' in the forum that can be accessed by clicking the keyword. Another external blog that was among the very first to comment on AV is the 'Digesting Veda blog'.
For those who want to get the full details on digestion of Hinduism, the links (total of 9 posts) provided above can be traversed in the following order:
1. Familiarize yourself with digestion activities in Kerala
2. Understand how digestion differs from both inclusivism and conversion
3. American Veda: start with the DigestingVeda blog
4. Then read Analysis-1 and Analysis-2
5. Read Part-1 and Part-2 of the current discussion on how American Veda is being supported by Hindu intellectuals (this one and the previous one)
6. Examine other discussions of digestion in the forum.
7. Don't stop there! Blog, discuss and educate others about this serious problem.
In Part-2 of our current discussion below, we examine the foreword and contents of Phil Goldberg's book 'American Veda' shared in this blog, and then see how Hindu intellectuals respond to it.
Inside the 'American Veda' - celebration of uturners
Subra shares: "...
Just the first 25 pages. We can see the shoddy scholarship, the Sanskrit
mistranslations being used to set the stage for digestion, the
reductionism, and the justification for digestion. Once this is done,
the remaining chapters celebrates one u-turner after another..."
Rajiv responds:
"Thanks for a good analysis. People who are in doubt should read the analysis:
It
is sad how many so-called supporters of our cause failed to understand
digestion at work, and went around proudly promoting the author. One
such man called me... to say: "What if we get him to state he is against the Aryan theory and against missionaries"?
I told this man he does not understand digestion. It is not about being
against missionaries, being against Aryan theory, and so forth.
If
a thief is taking your assets and digesting them by characterizing them
as belonging to others, does it help you because he praises your home,
expresses anger at some of your opponents, etc and other unrelated
things.
THE DIGESTER LOVES WHAT HE IS DIGESTING OTHERWISE HE WONT DIGEST IT. Why am I unable to get this across???
These
people among us are so STUPID and ignorant of our own history where we
have seen so many westerners support us, praise us, etc precisely to
dupe such IDIOTS. By now we ought to have no more fools but sadly we do.
I
am confident I can get a statement from Witzel opposing missionaries.
In fact he told me as such in person many years ago. But is that the
issue???
Can Hinduism be rescued by a bandwagon of fools, who are
easily swayed, lazy to read and understand issues, and in awe of
someone supporting them with glamor.
I hope people who have promoted his works will now do penance by promoting the link above with greater enthusiasm."
Aditya has a useful suggestion:
"... Does anyone want in this group want to write an "alternative" review for
AV on Amazon with a mention of "Being Different" as a book to read?
... for someone who has [read the book], this would be
one small step in the right direction."
css shares feedback from another person who disagreed that 'American Veda is digestion'. Please read the details in the forum. We only provide a gist of the arguments here:
1. He acknowledges the impact of Indian spirituality on America
2. He is not working on behalf of missionaries
3. He is not a practitioner in the Ken Wilber mould
4. Sloppy scholarship does not prove digestion
Rajiv comment: The above looks at DIRECT digestion only. Does not
understand the subtlety and multi layered processes at work. This
simplistic view is quiet common and hence I know my work is cut out for
me.
PhilG valorizes digesters - he himself does not have to be one. Every
digester has a coterie of cheerleaders supporting him, building is brand
value, legitimizing him. These cheerleaders might not be smart enough
to do the heavy thinking like a digester. They are his support team.
PhilG is such a cheerleader. Wilber and Keating are examples of top tier
digesters that PhilG celebrates. Good analogies are:
- most sepoys merely suck up to another thinker and hence build brand
credibility for a major thinker and are not capable of doing this
thinking themselves.
- People in Indian media are supporting X but not doing the nasty things
personally that X does. Yet we oppose such media persons. They are part
of the entourage of X that makes X important.
The problem .... is that he has not read Keating or Wilber,
for example...What he sees is PhilG praising these folks in ways that
seem reasonable. This is why incomplete knowledge is dangerous... I have separate
volumes in the pipeline on each of these men, along with many others.
The history of PhilG work with me... (Read the original and complete information in the forum).
...
5) When the book came out I was shocked. He took all my info on the uturners and made them look like heroes.
This inverts my thesis. He celebrates the process that I consider a
problem...
6) ...PG's book has a couple of pages on me. I am
depicted as someone who complains about uturns. He is dismissive of my
complaint. He includes me to be able to say "I have already factored
what Malhotra has to say". This is a tactic to dispose of a serious
issue without properly dealing with it.
....point on PG criticizing missionaries is simply
irrelevant. It further shows shallowness of understanding this theater.
...Witzel also opposes proselytizers, and so do most
western scholars we fight - Doniger, et al. By the standards of
sophisticated western scholars, proselytizing is crude, old fashion,
meant for extreme right wing christianity. These folks are liberal left
wing and hence anti-proselytizing.
....As I said
before: People who digest from the liberal left wing side are not
proselytizers or in support of them. For instance, Wilber is too
sophisticated to operate at the evangelism level. Nor are any of the
neuro-scientists and cognitive scientists appropriating Hindu and
Buddhist ideas and practices. ... understand
the complexity of liberal/leftist ideas of dharma and not try to collapse
all western approaches as proselytizing. (For one thing Jews are not
christians or proselytizers and yet many of them are digesters!)
It is sad that while I must invest years of rigor to get one book at a
time out, there are "supporters" who cant wait. .... On limited knowledge they align
themselves with the very same digesters I spend all my time
investigating."
Curating Rajiv Malhotra's Works. Online Resource, Database, Crowd Sourcing, and Expert Feedback on Contemporary Hinduism, Dharmic India, and topics covered in 'Breaking India', 'Being Different: An Indian Challenge to Western Universalism", 'Indra's Net: Defending Hinduism's Philosophical Unity', 'The Battle For Sanskrit', and the newly released book 'Academic Hinduphobia'.
Showing posts with label conversion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conversion. Show all posts
Why are Hindus Celebrating the Digestion of Hinduism? - Part 2
Labels:
American Veda,
anti-conversion,
conversion,
Digestion,
Father Keating,
Ken Wilber,
M. Witzel,
Missionary,
Neuroscience,
Phil Goldberg,
Sepoy,
U-Turn,
Wendy Doniger
What are the differences between Digestion and Conversion?
This is another very important post in the series on 'digestion. Here we examine the difference between the differences between digesting Hinduism versus converting Hindus to some Abrahamic religion.
November 2013
None in US will support Missionaries' conversions in India
Raghav started this thread by sharing a link and commenting:
The following was posted on an another e-group (Hindu Civilization). The good cop's assurance is what I see here. Mr. Goldberg might have overlooked Rajiv Ji's 'Breaking India'
Rajiv comment: The digester will repackage it (i.e. digest) into whatever western framework he subscribes to. This means there are as many varieties of digestion as there are varieties of predators..Specifically, the following is a partial list of western digesters:
1) Christians who will turn it into a part of christianity.
2) Hard material scientists turn it into secular science.
3) Post-modernists will show that it is generic and same in every culture.
4) Indians into Dalitstan/Dravidstan will show that whatever is good about it belonged to pre-Aryan people who are now the dalits/dravidians. Whatever is wrong with it was a contamination by later aryans turned into brahmins.
5) Islamic scholars will show it was always part of islam.
I am aghast at the trivial/superficial capacity of our so-called thought leaders. They have still not understood the following:
- the difference between hinduism haters and hinduism digesters (and some who combine both).
- the difference between several kinds of digesters, as illustrated above.
- the public postures of good cop and bad cop, which can hide the private agendas of hater or digester. I got calls and private emails from Hindus claiming victory that a digester touring India was speaking against missionaries, hence he is good for us!!!
November 2013
None in US will support Missionaries' conversions in India
Raghav started this thread by sharing a link and commenting:
The following was posted on an another e-group (Hindu Civilization). The good cop's assurance is what I see here. Mr. Goldberg might have overlooked Rajiv Ji's 'Breaking India'
'None in US will support Missionaries' conversion activities in India', says Philip Goldberg, author of American Veda
Rajiv comment: Jews are active digesters though they dont convert. Most Christian digesters are liberal, left wingers who hate missionaries. They reject Christianity and the digestion is into WESTERN SECULARISM/SCIENCE. Will I see the day when our folks do not think of every problematic person as christian missionary? On the one hand our folks are seriously troubled by the LEFT and yet they confuse them all as missionaries. If YOU read BI (forget whether Goldberg read it; did YOU read it?) you ought to notice the clear emphasis that leftwing and rightwing threats are DIFFERENT. If so, why is it a big deal for a leftwing to certify that he hates missionaries???
...All that someone has to do to get certified by morons is to decry missionaries.
To make it simple again: If you want to eat and digest food you do not reject it, do you? You LOVE it. Thats digestor mindset = love for Hinduism as food to be digested.
On the contrary, if you are a missionary you propagate REJECTING it. Can you please see these are OPPOSITES and yet each is harming us?
Another attempt: Missionary teaches repulsion for it. Digestor teaches love for it as food. The Christian Yoga promoters LOVE yoga, not hate it."
Rajiv comment: Jews are active digesters though they dont convert. Most Christian digesters are liberal, left wingers who hate missionaries. They reject Christianity and the digestion is into WESTERN SECULARISM/SCIENCE. Will I see the day when our folks do not think of every problematic person as christian missionary? On the one hand our folks are seriously troubled by the LEFT and yet they confuse them all as missionaries. If YOU read BI (forget whether Goldberg read it; did YOU read it?) you ought to notice the clear emphasis that leftwing and rightwing threats are DIFFERENT. If so, why is it a big deal for a leftwing to certify that he hates missionaries???
...All that someone has to do to get certified by morons is to decry missionaries.
To make it simple again: If you want to eat and digest food you do not reject it, do you? You LOVE it. Thats digestor mindset = love for Hinduism as food to be digested.
On the contrary, if you are a missionary you propagate REJECTING it. Can you please see these are OPPOSITES and yet each is harming us?
Another attempt: Missionary teaches repulsion for it. Digestor teaches love for it as food. The Christian Yoga promoters LOVE yoga, not hate it."
Neeraj asks:
"... when the digester is assimilating [Yoga],
he is branding it as Christian Yoga and not something neutral like
holistic yoga or secular yoga. If the digester is leftist, then his/her
hatred for christianity would push him to do so. Wouldn't it?
Rajiv comment: The digester will repackage it (i.e. digest) into whatever western framework he subscribes to. This means there are as many varieties of digestion as there are varieties of predators..Specifically, the following is a partial list of western digesters:
1) Christians who will turn it into a part of christianity.
2) Hard material scientists turn it into secular science.
3) Post-modernists will show that it is generic and same in every culture.
4) Indians into Dalitstan/Dravidstan will show that whatever is good about it belonged to pre-Aryan people who are now the dalits/dravidians. Whatever is wrong with it was a contamination by later aryans turned into brahmins.
5) Islamic scholars will show it was always part of islam.
I am aghast at the trivial/superficial capacity of our so-called thought leaders. They have still not understood the following:
- the difference between hinduism haters and hinduism digesters (and some who combine both).
- the difference between several kinds of digesters, as illustrated above.
- the public postures of good cop and bad cop, which can hide the private agendas of hater or digester. I got calls and private emails from Hindus claiming victory that a digester touring India was speaking against missionaries, hence he is good for us!!!
What a bunch of murukha (idiots).
"
Harish summarizes: "...digestion means "loving" and conversion means
"rejecting". I really appreciate Rajiv ji's clarity of thought."
Rajiv comment: "Digesting is deadly love. I love you in such a way that you turn into my property and lose your self existence. When I see a delicious dish I appreciate it and praise it. A stupid deer would go around saying "he loves me and invited me to his dinner table". What makes digestion far more dangerous is that it occurs over a long time. The digestion tract takes time to suck out the nutrients and expel what's waste. So fools being digested go around dancing with glee that the predator is being so nice to them."
Rajiv comment: "Digesting is deadly love. I love you in such a way that you turn into my property and lose your self existence. When I see a delicious dish I appreciate it and praise it. A stupid deer would go around saying "he loves me and invited me to his dinner table". What makes digestion far more dangerous is that it occurs over a long time. The digestion tract takes time to suck out the nutrients and expel what's waste. So fools being digested go around dancing with glee that the predator is being so nice to them."
Srinath makes an interesting observation:
"Aren't
both digestion and conversion observed in varying degrees across the WU
power spectrum... Missionaries reject, convert, and subjugate for the
most part but also engage in stealth digestion. Examples from pagan
Europe abound. The Scientists on the other hand while being "uber"
predators - also negate other sources of intelligence, suppress
independence with groupism, etc. For sure digestion is the killer app
because it can be resorted to with subterfuge when heavy handedness
isn't yielding the highest return. I see this mix of digest/convert
between let's say, Akbar and Aurangzeb. Neither of them were 100% in
one area but even within their lifetimes the pendulum swung slightly
this way or that depending on the political landscape."
Rajiv comment: "Yes. This is how I have explained these. Its about time our members got beyond the basics and started going further. We cannot afford to come back to ground zero every few weeks and repeat the same basics."
Rajiv comment: "Yes. This is how I have explained these. Its about time our members got beyond the basics and started going further. We cannot afford to come back to ground zero every few weeks and repeat the same basics."
Labels:
American Veda,
anti-conversion,
conversion,
Digestion,
Missionary,
Phil Goldberg
RMF Summary: Week of January 23 - 29, 2012
January 26
Invading the Sacred
Ganesh shares: Outlook India had published this article on "Invading the Sacred" in their Jun29, 2007 edition.
This is an article by Sri Rajiv Malhotra titled "Was the US Senate Attack on Hinduism an isolated Instance?"
January 26
"...You have skillfully positioned "Dharm" to represent Hinduism,
Buddhism, Jainism & Sikhism, the latter three of which have already
acquired the status of "minorities" in the Indian polity, if not in the
Indian Constitution, which has no reference to the term "minority". That
leaves only Hinduism in the word "Dharm" for all practical political
& social purposes. The rubric of "dharmic traditions" now
seems to be more appropriate & sufficiently nebulous for the
purpose of including all the above four paths emerging out of Hinduism
as well as to take away the pointing arrow from Hinduism, for the
purposes of debates in inter-faith dialogues. Your concluding remark
that Gandhi's example is the only hope for a meaningful turn around in
the global context, is most apt & projects a ray of hope for the
future. This is however, easier said than done. The strategy of how
Gandhi's example can be followed as a way for a worldwide spiritual,
intellectual & social movement, perhaps needs to be worked upon.
With your vision, you could help in shaping the outlines of such a
movement, drawing upon right-minded people from all over the world.
Nalini responds:
"... i would still hesitate to club the practised faiths all together, for their substance and essence in an organized frame soon degenerate into a fossilized mass that does not evolve along with human thought and experience. Can I continue to belong to an evolving Humanism unfettered by the prescriptions of any one dictum or dogma. At least I can continue to be my own kind of a Hindu, while you can be yours. i would still cherish my childish experience of Jesus the savior, in my catholic schooling, as i cherish the love trust and comraderie of the Sunni family in the border lands of Iran. The Babaji
of my Sikh Grand Mother, and the Arya Samajic traditions of my parental home. Not to forget the aggressive Atheism of my Husband and the gentle persuasion ....
Western Universalism reigned for a while linked as it was to Greek thought and supported by a positivist methodology. Eastern experience has been intuitive and inner directed, whereas the western was sensory, empirical and outward. The
Dualism plays itself out to coalesce into one unity, in every sphere. Let us patiently wait for that to happen."
Rajiv comment: I see JCP performing an important role in the churning process (the motif on the cover of BD of the churning of the ocean of creativity). Nalini appreciates her own churning sparked by the churning of many persons she names above. By the same token, I dont think we need to be afraid to churn further ourselves. We are endowed with the capacity to do so, unlike in history centric systems where only history can give us access to the truth.
While at the surface level, all the above named systems are ok to practice simultaneously within oneself, upon further churning by her, my prediction is that Nalini will appreciate that there are indeed contradictions amongst them, and that its better at some stage to deal with these. That is the stage at which the process starts where BD begins - appreciating the need to understand differences rather than avoiding them in the name of harmony."
Hitanshu suggests:
"The only solution I see in order to prevent digestion is to inculcate in Hinduism a conversion right. That is to say if some westerner wants to perform yoga then the yoga teacher asks them to denounce christ as a false god just the
missionaries do when the convert tribal hindus. This could be done by making the christian break christ statue or step on pictures of christ. But then, we wont be much different from them, right. On the other hand we should not forget that only poison can cure poison."
Rajiv comment: I disagree. This crude approach will backfire with the majority and will appeal only to an extreme on the margins. It will cause people to reject dharma and put it in the same image as Islam in many circles.
Instead, I propose the following steps:
1) Teach in yoga class the Yoga Sutra of Patanjali (and then Kapil's Samkhya foundation for advanced students), in which karma is emphasized. And karma is solidly linked with reincarnation.
2) Once karma-reincarnation are established as inseparable from yoga, the next step is to use chapter 2 of BD to contrast history centrism with adhyatma vidya.
3) Once history centrism is rejected, Nicene Creed gets thrown out the window.
I believe that many if not most Judeo-Christians who go to yoga (if taught properly) would be willing to come this far, which is quite a lot. I have tested it on many westerners in yoga over the years and even funded the teaching of Patanjali at such classes.
Its our gurus who gave it away without even trying this approach. Once the Nicene Creed and Jesus's historicity and exclusivity are removed (explained as blockages to advancement in yoga) THEN the student will undergo a cognitive shift with respect to Judeo-Christian affiliation."
January 28
Invading the Sacred
Ganesh shares: Outlook India had published this article on "Invading the Sacred" in their Jun29, 2007 edition.
This is an article by Sri Rajiv Malhotra titled "Was the US Senate Attack on Hinduism an isolated Instance?"
January 26
What would a 'modern person' look like after 'Dharmic Universalism'
JCP shares: |
Our mission is "Dharmic Universalism" is what you had averred in
one of your mails. I have just put some thoughts together to picture
what an individual would be doing in such a world as follows:-
(i) Each person would intellectually believe in "being
different", according to ones own world view of choice, inclining
towards one of these - Western or Chinese or Islamic or Dharmic
Universalism.
(ii) Emotionally, each person would be devoted to ones own
passions &compassion, within ethically & socially acceptable
restraints in conformity with ones own world view.
(iii)
Action-wise, each person would work for ones own (& perhaps, ones
family's) physical, mental & spiritual capacity development to full
potential, in conformity with ones own world view, to enable creative
thinking, giving rise to sustainable action leading to sustainable
regenerative development.
(iv) At the foot-slogging level, each person would choose a path
believing in "being different" according to ones own inclinations,
capacities & capabilities & respecting the path chosen by every
other person."
Nalini responds:
"... i would still hesitate to club the practised faiths all together, for their substance and essence in an organized frame soon degenerate into a fossilized mass that does not evolve along with human thought and experience. Can I continue to belong to an evolving Humanism unfettered by the prescriptions of any one dictum or dogma. At least I can continue to be my own kind of a Hindu, while you can be yours. i would still cherish my childish experience of Jesus the savior, in my catholic schooling, as i cherish the love trust and comraderie of the Sunni family in the border lands of Iran. The Babaji
of my Sikh Grand Mother, and the Arya Samajic traditions of my parental home. Not to forget the aggressive Atheism of my Husband and the gentle persuasion ....
Western Universalism reigned for a while linked as it was to Greek thought and supported by a positivist methodology. Eastern experience has been intuitive and inner directed, whereas the western was sensory, empirical and outward. The
Dualism plays itself out to coalesce into one unity, in every sphere. Let us patiently wait for that to happen."
Rajiv comment: I see JCP performing an important role in the churning process (the motif on the cover of BD of the churning of the ocean of creativity). Nalini appreciates her own churning sparked by the churning of many persons she names above. By the same token, I dont think we need to be afraid to churn further ourselves. We are endowed with the capacity to do so, unlike in history centric systems where only history can give us access to the truth.
While at the surface level, all the above named systems are ok to practice simultaneously within oneself, upon further churning by her, my prediction is that Nalini will appreciate that there are indeed contradictions amongst them, and that its better at some stage to deal with these. That is the stage at which the process starts where BD begins - appreciating the need to understand differences rather than avoiding them in the name of harmony."
Hitanshu suggests:
"The only solution I see in order to prevent digestion is to inculcate in Hinduism a conversion right. That is to say if some westerner wants to perform yoga then the yoga teacher asks them to denounce christ as a false god just the
missionaries do when the convert tribal hindus. This could be done by making the christian break christ statue or step on pictures of christ. But then, we wont be much different from them, right. On the other hand we should not forget that only poison can cure poison."
Rajiv comment: I disagree. This crude approach will backfire with the majority and will appeal only to an extreme on the margins. It will cause people to reject dharma and put it in the same image as Islam in many circles.
Instead, I propose the following steps:
1) Teach in yoga class the Yoga Sutra of Patanjali (and then Kapil's Samkhya foundation for advanced students), in which karma is emphasized. And karma is solidly linked with reincarnation.
2) Once karma-reincarnation are established as inseparable from yoga, the next step is to use chapter 2 of BD to contrast history centrism with adhyatma vidya.
3) Once history centrism is rejected, Nicene Creed gets thrown out the window.
I believe that many if not most Judeo-Christians who go to yoga (if taught properly) would be willing to come this far, which is quite a lot. I have tested it on many westerners in yoga over the years and even funded the teaching of Patanjali at such classes.
Its our gurus who gave it away without even trying this approach. Once the Nicene Creed and Jesus's historicity and exclusivity are removed (explained as blockages to advancement in yoga) THEN the student will undergo a cognitive shift with respect to Judeo-Christian affiliation."
January 28
Dharmic traditions: Vietnamese celebrate New Year at Hindu temple
Venkat shares: Vietnamese celebrate New Year at Hindu temple Saibal Dasgupta, TNN | Jan 24, 2012, 02.49PM IST BEIJING: A flood of Vietnamese are flooding a Hindu temple in Ho Chi Minh City during the 7-day Tet festival that began last Friday, according to Indian residents of the city and local Vietnamese. More than 50,000 people, almost all Buddhists, prayed at the Mariammam Temple through the day and the entire night during the Vietnamese New Year on Sunday. The flow continued through Tuesday with several thousand local people visiting each day. "The local Vietnamese believe that worshiping at this temple during the New Year festival will bring good luck," Atul Kumar, a businessmen who has been in HCMC since the 1980s told TNN. A visitor from India reported that people were observing both Hindu and Buddhist rituals to please the gods at the temple..." January 28
January 29
January 29
Krishna: History or Myth (with Portuguese subtitles) from Saraswati Films on Vimeo. Srinivas responds: "I think there are a lot of incorrect conclusions derived from the video here. I agree that referring to Krishna, as the father of Jesus, while fine if argued metaphorically is at the same time, very dangerous according to what BD says. But the question to ask here is if those ISKON devotees were right, "according to Hindu dharma", in conceptualizing Jesus as the son of Krishna, the God? I think the answer lies in a concept called Ista devata and Swa-Dharma, both explained in detailed in BD as central ideas. Dharma operates at 3 levels. One, Sanatana dharma being eternal truths from the Vedas and Upanishads. Two, Kala dharma or the one that changes wrt time like the smrithi. Third, Swa-dharma where you have the choice of choosing your Ishta devata. While Sanatana, Kala and Swa dharma could each be different, to be spiritually successful, each should support the other. I.E. Swa dharma should support Kala dharma and Kala dharma should support Sanatana dharma. Meaning Swa dharma needs to be sacrificed for the greater good of Kala dharma and similarly Kala dharma should align itself to Sanatana dharma. The problem comes when someone's Swa dharma is imposed as Kala dharma or Sanatana dharma of others as is happening in the many examples sited in BD. Swa dharma is also something very personal between a Sadhaka and his Guru. This results in many dangers when shared with the public who are not aligned with this thought process. The sadhaka should also make a difference between one's Swa dharma and the right of everyone else to have their own Swa dharma, different from oneself. One has to be very careful about what aspects of one's behavior can be elevated to Kala dharma. And only apaurusheya can be elevated to Sanatana dharma. Just because BD critiques history aspect of religions does not mean dharma traditions should not research into whether Mahabharata or Ramayana took place or not. I dont see a greater time and need for such research to happen in dharmic traditions. It is high time we encourage and support such work. None of this means dharma traditions become "history centric". The main thesis of BD is that in abrahamic religions, if history is taken away, does their belief and spirituality still have any meaning? I.E. if there was no original sin and if Jesus was not a historical figure would you still believe in Jesus' teaching? This is not ever the case in dharma or anywhere in this video...." |
Labels:
Adhyatma Vidya,
conversion,
Dharmic,
Heisenberg,
History-Centric,
Invading the Sacred,
Krishna,
Mariamman,
Nicene Creed,
Patanjali,
Sameness,
Schrodinger,
Secularism,
Vietnam
Case Study: Debating with an Elite Convert
This thread covers a discussion that concluded in July 2011. Here is the original thread:
Need advice on how to dialog with an elite who has converted
In this case study, 'Rajee', an acquittance of Rakesh, is a member of an elite management institute, and a recent convert to Christianity that alarms Rajesh, who wants her to ensure she has her eyes fully open. It appears that one or both of these persons live outside India. Rajee is willing to discuss the situation with Rakesh who posted this: "Now, guys, here is an elite Hindu, educated at leading Management institutes, who has been converted
Willing to dialog with me. Can we provide arguments to make her see the point, we are all trying to make ?
Rakesh shares a message he sent her (excerpts): " ... Do write about your experience with Jesus
I have often found, such subjective " experiences " often cloud one's objectivity. Personal
disappointments, emotional succour at the right time by say christians,
constant repetition of certain pre programmed messages by your family,
often have similar effects... i am willing to share my experiences and you may do yours. I
want to make sure your conversion is based on real faith and so, i will
test yours through this correspondence..."
Rajee's response:
"... I am going
through a great personal relationship with Jesus...and of course each
one to his own. Just as each life comes with an unique formula to
unravel itself, I believe even the choice of God worship is one such.
For me it has been an amazing journey so far- with abundant grace
leading to great self introspection..."
The first email sent by Rajesh to Rajee is excerpted below: "Dear rajee ... Good to know you have had a multi cultural marriage, congrats. However, i believe your initial reaction to your local pastor, should not extend to all christianity. Please read the history of inquisition, greek woman philosopher hypatia etc. There is a book by rajiv malhotra on breaking india, you should read it. Most inter cultural dialog initiatied by the church has a pre determined conclusion- jesus is the only way, your way is fundamentally wrong. The initial friendliness soon evaporates, if you probe further, unfortunate and not in line with Christ's teachings but true . ... i would sincerely like to continue this dialog and find out more, without troubling your affectionate relationship with [her Christian husband, I presume]. As some one who is committed to multiculturalism, based on a hindu approach to life, this is of deep interest to me." --------------------------------------------------------------------
The above are relevant excerpts from Rakesh's initial post that, if you observe, already includes a degree of Purva Paksha of Christianity. Now let us examine the feedback from RMF contributors.
Margaret, a PhD scholar responded:
"I am following that conversation attentitevely. This is a recurring problem in so many colonized countries when elite educated take upon themselves to defend their christian colonizers religion and mode of operation that lead their country in a mess. I defended a thesis on that issue of elites
returning to their roots and how they have done it in facing internal factors, external factors. I wish your book [Breaking India] was available during that time? When I ordered it last month it and read it. It should struck a cord in all indigenous people because this is the story on how the world was colonized." Ram follows up: "May I point out that the process of converting the so-called heathens (i.e. the indigenous civilisations of Asia) is now in fast forward mode ? A classic example of the long reach of evangelists massively financed by western countries is the fast growth of Christianity in South Korea. It rose from 43,000 (o.28 percent of total population) to a whopping 13,000,000 (i.e. nearly 40% of total population) in 1990.
After reading my friend Rajiv Malhotra's well researched book,
'Breaking India', I am now convinced that soon, very soon, Hindus of
South India, especially Tamil Nadu, will face the same situation..."
Suresh has prepared a reference to Rakesh:
"*Below link has a number of discussions on almost all major points.
"
Raj suggests:
"The essential problem here is: Parenting. Dharmic parents should signup their children for yoga and meditation programs, by the time they are about 10 years old... Doing yoga and meditation regularly, along with studying the Upanishads and Gita, will immunize the children against exclusivist ideologies."
Rajiv Malhotra disagrees on the grounds of necessary condition - but insufficient and suggests that the problem lies in the history-centrism of Christianity:
"While this kind of upbringing is important, it DOES NOT IMMUNIZE against conversion. You have made similar posts before which also implied that dharma as a "way of life" is all it is. I replied earlier as well that A WAY OF LIFE CAN
EASILY BE IMPORTED AND ASSIMILATED TO FIT INTO JESUS' UNIQUE HISTORY. Nothing bothers the christian narrative if jesus is shown as yogi and meditator, in fact thats what inculturation is all about. The next gen of bharatnatyam dancers and training centers in many indian states is largely christian. the same trend is for yoga in USA. so how does knowing yoga/meditation counteract a version of christianity that already has these assimilated. ... Todays churches use sanskrit names, the priests even wear saffron, prayers are like puja including aarti, incense, sitting crosslegged on floor. But the CONTENT is 100% Nicene Creed - that we suffer due to original sin, that jesus took virgin birth making him not a sinner, that he died for us so we may not have to suffer, and hence the only way to salvation is by accepting this HISTORY of events. I have written, written and written for 20 years about this central difference made by such a HISTORY. it seems to go in one ear and out the other. i have no idea what to do - or just give up??? ..."
There are several followups, but none that do a Purva Paksha of Christianity, although Suresh' attempt, without the benefit of reading 'Being Different' that was not yet available at that time is laudable. No other guest contributor has suggested a solution to Rakesh's immediate problem and the focus shifted to future issues. Rajiv Malhotra's response to one such followup:
"...Rajiv response: I have not read these specific works. But if they are like dozens of similar things I have read, they ARE INSUFFICIENT BECAUSE THEY LACK A GOOD PURVA PAKSHA...
Hindu leaders have helped facilitate this process starting with three major movements: Ramakrishna Mission's US leaders such as Swami Pramananada, Parmahansa Yogananda, J. Krishnamurti. Scores of Hindu thinkers have followed
suit and made this fashionable. ... Only after you reach the stage of grasping what I wrote above can one begin inquiring what the remedies are. Thats why I resist letting people jump fast to "solutions" because these tend to be obsolete, superficial and without the understanding of the intellectual discourse on the other side"
Dr. Basant provides an useful suggestion:
"This has been an issue which has confronted us all along. Even more so
here in the US today... We are competing against religions, who have their
basic tenets so exclusive that they will without any doubt proclaim
theirs is the only way. ...the central principle of our
dharma is freedom of thought and expression. However, our teachings from
our religious leaders are that all religions are same, and a vast
majority of us do not care. ...We have to be willing to read Old
testament and Koran, and then be willing to tell our children and others
that their dogma is so contradictory to our teachings"
Vishal provides feedback from a related prior experience. I found it tough to summarize this, so I've included his full comment.
"In my teenager class, I actually take the Koran and Bible with me.
Two years ago, a teenager was upset and started arguing with me that
Muhammad was a Yogi. He 'quoted' Muhammad to the effect that 'an ounce
of meditation is worth more than a pound of prayer' (or something
similar). I asked him where did he say that. He could not get the
answer.
One day, I opened a page of the Koran and read it out to him. He
was horrified and argued that it was not a genuine copy of Koran. I
asked him to verify himself that the Koran was published an Islamic
nation, and was translated by an Islamic scholar. Similar things
happened a few times again (there were other kids too who said similar
things) but each time they were asked to read the Bible and the Koran in
front of everyone. The objections ceased in a few months. The teenager mentioned above is now going to be a teacher in our school starting in September."
Ramachandra commented:
".. With in a span of just 20 years Arya Samaj had phenomenal impact in
the society by [re-]converting as much people as close to half a million.It is estimated by various people that by 1920, there were
around 200000+ people who have been [re-]converted in the Punjab and Kashmir
provinces alone from Islam to Hinduism..."
The remaining followups had very little to do with Rakesh and Rajee. There was no followup from Rakesh. 'Purva Paksha' of Christianity may have helped Rakesh to prepare a followup for Rajee. Unfortunately, 'Being Different' was not yet released at that time, so many of us [Hindus] were largely unaware of the irreconcilable differences between Dharmic faiths and Abrahamic religions.
If you are Hindu [any race/country/born/converted] who is concerned about the problem of induced conversions, and have gone through this discussion thread (especially in its original form):
Take a few minutes to reflect on this situation and try answering the following question to the best of your ability, knowing what you know now.
Suppose you were Rajee's friend. How would you follow up with her? (If possible, add your comments and indicate if you have already read 'Being Different' or not) .
|
Labels:
Arya Samaj,
Being Different,
Bharatanatyam,
Case study,
colonization,
conversion,
Debate,
History-Centric,
Hypatia,
inquisition,
Jiddu,
Nicene Creed,
P.Yogananda,
Paramananda,
Purva Paksha,
South Korea
RMF Summary: Week of July 4 - 10, 2011
This first thread involved a lot of discussion, so we will try to summarize this in a separate thread. July 4 Need advice on how to dialog with an elite who has converted Now, guys, here is an elite Hindu, educated at leading Management institutes, who has been converted Willing to dialog with me Can we provide arguments to make... July 4
|
Labels:
Christianity,
conversion,
Dutch,
Dwajastampa,
Michel Danino,
Padmanabha Swamy,
Sameness,
Surendra K. Sharma,
Taj,
USCIRF
RMF Summary: Week of June 20 - 26, 2011
Watch this video at your own risk. June 20 Video: Four superstar "India experts" lecture at New School, New York One of the speakers is the famous Sheldon Pollock who won the GOI's Padma Bhushan award (author of "The death of Sanskrit" and a theorist that Sanskrit is a language that oppresses dalits). He is also the man in charge to produce a series of classical Indian texts translated into English for English speaking youth worldwide, funded by Narayana Murthy. Another speaker on Hindu "puritanism" is Wendy Doniger. Another is an Indian discussing how the Mumbai establishment is terrorizing the Muslims in the pretext of controlling terrorism... June 20
|
Labels:
Aryan Invasion Theory,
Bhyrappa,
BI Video,
Book Extracts,
Carpentier,
conversion,
D. Pipes,
Michel Danino,
Narayana Murthy,
Newsgram,
Pope,
Rajaram,
S. Mukherjee,
S. Pollock,
Textbook,
Undercurrents,
Wendy Doniger
RMF Summary: Week of April 18 - 24, 2011
April 18
Breaking India - A Review Essay
Breaking India - A Review Essay By Krishna Kirti Das April 18
"I suspect that, in the years to come, we should see similar motivated "research" in India - what with UChicago setting up a centre in New Delhi avowedly to “pursue ideas for the sake of ideas” and other such illustrious institutions no doubt lining up for a piece of the action" April 18
|
Labels:
Chilapathikaram,
conversion,
Infosys,
Krishna Kirti Das,
Lorenzen,
Martyr,
Mimamsa,
N. Ram,
Pakistan,
Prema Nandakumar,
Review,
S. Pollock
RMF Summary: Week of October 29-November 4, 2012 - Part 2
Readers who arrived here via a twitter link (or have a twitter account) and are eager to contribute are requested to tweet/RT or post comments in the group discussion, since there are a couple of calls for volunteers to assist and/or provide critical feedback. How you can assist: 1. Sanskrit text references for or against views expressed by Rajiv ji in Part-1. Read the summary (and the entire discussion in RMF) prior to jumping in. 2. Logistical help in Chicago. See Nov3 post below. Part-1 of the week's summary can be found here.
"Rajiv ji but your blogs and talks (in u-tube) have been very very useful. I have been able generate a lot of interest amongst my friend circle. Surprisingly/sadly there is very little coverage in Indian media about your books and your other work (correct me if I am wrong). But certainly lot of people have started to take note of your videos of late." Rajiv comment: The number of views for my youtube videos is very small when you compare with popular thinkers on similar topics. Regarding Indian media's lack of coverage - you are correct. One can understand the posture of the media who are ideologically opposed. But the tragedy is that even those who think along similar lines are more interested in plagiarizing and turning it into their own works no matter how diluted or poorly argued. Also, there is frenzy among the so-called hindu activists to boost personal careers and status by using whatever ideas they can quickly pick up and start throwing out as one-liners, even if they dont really get it. All this causes dilution of support for the heavy research and publishing work that remains mostly undone... |
Labels:
AAR,
Acharya Sabha,
Ashtanga,
Chicago,
conversion,
Pattabhi Jois,
Science and Sanskrit,
Yoga
RMF Summary: Week of October 17-23, 2012
Italicized words are mine and not part of the original RMF post.
http://archive.org/details/TheEmergenceOfHinduism
This is truly wonderful news. Please share this.
Rajiv Malhotra posts: I am copying below a concrete example of textbook changes we have caused just this past week with the help of a very tiny team and with zero budget. The Hinduism chapter of one very popular US school textbook is now being corrected as a result of what we did just in the past month. You can see the impact that has resulted very quickly. We did not hold any gatherings (of "like minded people" to give lectures to each other, or pat each other's backs, spend a single dollar of budget.) But we did the right action. Nor have we made any public noises about what we were doing. Since I initiated the USA textbook changes project nearly 20 years ago, we have a large database of such books and critiques, along with various attempts both successful and failed.... (7 comments)
October 22: Dramatic growth of Hindu education institutions across the country
The rising sun of the swamiji schools With yoga, transcendental meditation, Indian spiritual wisdom and cuisine having won themselves global reputation,..
(This may seem like the change that Hindus can believe in, but there is more to this than meets the eye it seems. Rajiv Malhotra, notes, among other things, ".. But many schools i visit that are run by big hindu gurus are in fact trying hard to become like the old convent schools run by christians. Even the yoga taught in many cases is like the secularized YMCA yoga, depleted of its hindu roots.")
October 23: Thread Closed-"Foreign invaders were unimpressed by Hindustan"
This thread based on Eddie (Hadley?)'s comment is now closed. Is spite of the many & varied responses from other group members, commenter Eddie merely kept...
(what a relief!)
October 23: Italians converting to Hinduism - ??
Namaste. Placed below is a news item in circulation titled - Italians converting to Hinduism" ! Please follow through the post below carefully. Contemplate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
... To learn more, become a member of the Rajiv Malhotra Forum at Yahoogroups (it is free), and follow the illuminating discussions.
October 17: Hinduism emerged from Christianity - Book
If you enjoy reading fiction:
The author a Prof. M. M. Ninan has written a
book "The Emergence Of Hinduism From Christianity" Nearly a 1,000 have
downloaded it.
A Study of how Hinduism emerged from Christianity brought into India by St.Thomas by syncretic gnostic integration
October 18:
Christian conversion efforts in Bangalore.
Update: A person noted a similar situation at Karol Bagh station in New Delhi. The Bangalore Hindu did not keep quiet, and raised a ruckus upon being brazenly 'solicited', which scared the evangelist off. Interesting approach.
Rajiv Malhotra posts: I am copying below a concrete example of textbook changes we have caused just this past week with the help of a very tiny team and with zero budget. The Hinduism chapter of one very popular US school textbook is now being corrected as a result of what we did just in the past month. You can see the impact that has resulted very quickly. We did not hold any gatherings (of "like minded people" to give lectures to each other, or pat each other's backs, spend a single dollar of budget.) But we did the right action. Nor have we made any public noises about what we were doing. Since I initiated the USA textbook changes project nearly 20 years ago, we have a large database of such books and critiques, along with various attempts both successful and failed.... (7 comments)
October 22: Dramatic growth of Hindu education institutions across the country
The rising sun of the swamiji schools With yoga, transcendental meditation, Indian spiritual wisdom and cuisine having won themselves global reputation,..
(This may seem like the change that Hindus can believe in, but there is more to this than meets the eye it seems. Rajiv Malhotra, notes, among other things, ".. But many schools i visit that are run by big hindu gurus are in fact trying hard to become like the old convent schools run by christians. Even the yoga taught in many cases is like the secularized YMCA yoga, depleted of its hindu roots.")
October 23: Thread Closed-"Foreign invaders were unimpressed by Hindustan"
This thread based on Eddie (Hadley?)'s comment is now closed. Is spite of the many & varied responses from other group members, commenter Eddie merely kept...
(what a relief!)
October 23: Italians converting to Hinduism - ??
Namaste. Placed below is a news item in circulation titled - Italians converting to Hinduism" ! Please follow through the post below carefully. Contemplate.
Excerpts:
Question:Who would be happy to gloat about and training their future
killers and future generational bosses ?
Response: The so called '
Hindus' who don't understand what is ' Dharma ' Protection !
Reasoning: :
Why would Vatican invite a 'Veda Pundit' to train their own small folk and get
' authorized entry' in to the ' targeted ' Vedic Tradition' ? and desire the
training to he held at Italy ?----------------------------------------------------------------------
... To learn more, become a member of the Rajiv Malhotra Forum at Yahoogroups (it is free), and follow the illuminating discussions.
Labels:
conversion,
Digestion,
Success Story,
Textbook
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)